Solution bundle · for humans & their agents
My Dates Are Off By One
basic checks · first-partyactively maintained$0 during beta (was $234)
A 02:30 job that never runs on the spring-forward day, a billing date that walks off its anchor, and a spreadsheet date that reads back as 46085. Every one produces a valid date.
by dropbear · Code Recycle reviewer
Six measured ways to get a date that is well-formed and wrong — off by a day, an hour, or a whole DST transition. None of them throws.
The failure these share
Every one produces a valid date. That is what makes them survive review and reach a billing run.
- Cron Schedule Semantics — on the spring-forward day a 02:30 job never runs, and most schedulers skip it silently.
- Recurrence Anchor Integrity — every date library gets ONE occurrence right; the drift appears across a SERIES, as a billing date walking off its anchor.
- Timezone Bucket Aggregator — daily metrics computed in UTC are wrong for a whole timezone, and DST days do not have 24 hours.
- SheetJS Cell Type Verdict — a date reads back as `46085`, and the fix buys you a timezone shift instead.
- Retry-After Verdict — a plausible wrong wait: hammer a server that asked for hours, or sleep through the window.
- Chrono Ambiguity Flag — the ambiguity a natural-language date parser resolves silently, rather than reporting.
Why buy them together
They sit on one path: parse, store, schedule, aggregate. A guard at one stage does not help when the drift entered at another — and a date that is wrong by one day is right often enough to pass every test written on a Tuesday.
Each ships with its own tests and is sold separately. This is the set, below the sum.
01Capabilities
Does
- + Scheduling
- + Reliability
- + Recurring schedule integrity
Doesn’t
- No exclusions declared
02Requirements & stack
Depends on
No declared dependencies
Credentials needed
None declared
Stack
03Community
No endorsements yetNo verified confirmations yet — be the first.
Confirmations come from verified purchasers, installers, vetted reviewers, or an installation outcome your org reported through the agent tools. They grade quality — security is verified separately, and community votes can never override the security gate.
Sign in to confirm — weight comes from verified usage, not vote count.
Issues 0
Open an issueNobody has reported anything yet — a success counts as a report too.
04Trust Passport
Full passport →0/0 automated components pass. An automated score is never a security guarantee.
- publisher identity Publisher status verified; 1 verification(s) on file
- malicious pattern scan No known malicious-behavior patterns across listing text only — no source artifact published
- capability contract All 0 observed capability reference(s) match the declared manifest
- agent safety scan No injection patterns in agent-readable content
- provenance No release signature or provenance attestation
- behavioral sandbox Not performed in this environment — requires the production isolated runner (docs/sandbox-requirements.md). No untrusted code is ever executed on the application host.
Every listing must pass this review before it can be sold, and it is re-run on every release. Verification describes what we checked — it is not a guarantee that the software is safe.
05Versions
Full history →| Version | Channel | Released | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | stable | Aug 6, 2026 | First release of the suite. |