Component · for humans & their agents
Stripe Retry Safety Verdict
verified · first-partyactively maintained$0 during beta (was $79)
Two identical charge requests with no idempotency key produced two separate PaymentIntents. And your webhook signature check verified the same event three times out of three.
by ringbuffer · Code Recycle admin
Every claim on this page is refundable if it is untrue — refund policy.
Verified: 18 tests
Decides whether a payment call site or webhook handler can do its work TWICE. Pure function over facts visible at the call site: no I/O, no Stripe dependency.
Decides whether a payment call site or webhook handler can do its work TWICE. Pure function over facts visible at the call site: no I/O, no Stripe dependency.
THE MEASUREMENT: real Stripe test-mode API calls and real SDK signature construction. Nothing inferred from documentation.
WITHOUT A KEY, A RETRY CHARGES TWICE. Two identical PaymentIntent creations with no idempotency key returned pi_3U1asZPgyWISXbB71TUdrwUy and pi_3U1asZPgyWISXbB70HItTbOX -- two separate intents. A timeout the client retried, a proxy that replayed, a double-click. From Stripe's side two distinct requests arrived and both were honoured, so nothing reports a duplicate.
WITH A KEY, STRIPE IS LOUD -- NOT SILENT. Same key and same parameters returned the SAME PaymentIntent. Same key with a DIFFERENT amount was REJECTED with a typed StripeIdempotencyError. THIS IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WAS EXPECTED: the assumption going in was that Stripe would silently return the original $10 intent while the caller believed they had charged $50. It does not. So this package treats a MISSING or UNSTABLE key as the finding, and does not second-guess Stripe where a key is used correctly.
SIGNATURE VERIFICATION DOES NOT DEDUPLICATE. Stripe retries a webhook until it gets a 200, so the same event arrives more than once:
delivery #1: constructEvent ACCEPTED -- event evt_probe_00000001
delivery #2: constructEvent ACCEPTED -- event evt_probe_00000001
delivery #3: constructEvent ACCEPTED -- event evt_probe_00000001Three out of three. The signature proves the event is genuinely Stripe's; it says NOTHING about whether you have already acted on it. A handler that fulfils an order in the success branch fulfils it once per delivery. The event id IS stable across redeliveries -- that is your dedup key, and nothing records it for you.
THE TOLERANCE WINDOW BOUNDS AN ATTACKER, NOT STRIPE. A one-hour-old signature was REJECTED as outside the tolerance zone, so the default 300 seconds catches a captured request replayed later. It does nothing about Stripe's own redelivery, which arrives FRESHLY SIGNED and inside the window every time. Two different problems; only one has a built-in defence.
IT ALSO CATCHES the key that is regenerated per ATTEMPT -- a fresh uuid inside the retry loop is not an idempotency key, and the call looks protected in review because the parameter is present. It is the STABILITY of the value that does the work, and that is invisible at the call site.
IT REFUSES rather than guesses on unknown retryability -- saying plainly that for a payment call the answer is almost always yes -- and asks about signature verification and event-id deduplication SEPARATELY, because they are different protections and neither substitutes for the other.
VERIFIED: 18 tests, every one of 8 mutations observed FAILING before restore.
DELIVERY: signed download of a hash-verified tarball, immediately on purchase. Permissive licence: unlimited products, unlimited clients, unlimited seats, no attribution, perpetual and irrevocable. One restriction, do not republish the source as source.
Interface
What you call, and what comes back. Types and signatures only — the implementation ships with the source.
export function evaluatePaymentSite(site: CallSite): Verdict; export type CallSite = ChargeSite | WebhookSite;
export type Verdict = | { status: "SAFE";01Capabilities
Does
- + Idempotent fulfilment
- + Webhook signature verification
- + Payment integrity
Doesn’t
- No exclusions declared
02Requirements & stack
Depends on
No declared dependencies
Credentials needed
None declared
Stack
03Community
No endorsements yetNo verified confirmations yet — be the first.
Confirmations come from verified purchasers, installers, vetted reviewers, or an installation outcome your org reported through the agent tools. They grade quality — security is verified separately, and community votes can never override the security gate.
Sign in to confirm — weight comes from verified usage, not vote count.
Issues 1
Open an issue0 open · 0 answered · 0 fixed · 1 said it worked
- closedWorked for me — 18/18 vitest on Node 26.0.0, macOS 26.4Worked for me
04Trust Passport
Full passport →0/0 automated components pass. An automated score is never a security guarantee.
- publisher identity Publisher status verified; 1 verification(s) on file
- malicious pattern scan No known malicious-behavior patterns across 12 source file(s) plus listing text
- capability contract All 0 observed capability reference(s) match the declared manifest
- agent safety scan No injection patterns in agent-readable content
- provenance No release signature or provenance attestation
- behavioral sandbox Not performed in this environment — requires the production isolated runner (docs/sandbox-requirements.md). No untrusted code is ever executed on the application host.
Every listing must pass this review before it can be sold, and it is re-run on every release. Verification describes what we checked — it is not a guarantee that the software is safe.
05Versions
Full history →| Version | Channel | Released | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | stable | Aug 6, 2026 | First public release. |